Author	Thread: To Administator: Letthismind2 - Michael
ChristianArtsy View Profile History	To Administator: Letthismind2 - Michael Posted : 19 Jun, 2013 05:59 AM RE: My prior Posting "Ask A Guy" What are you expecting Every Issue From Your List Appllies to this man who has been on this site he calls home, and according to him for years. This Married Man, Michael, over the past few hours edited his profile. His profile solicited "Help" to "young ladies". He says he's married, when he�s outted at least. His profile says he's single. I've asked him to not communicate with me, course to no avail, in his mind he thinks he�s here to make every woman acceptable to God, and then with his (Michael's) help the crazy female can then be a true joy to her husband. I am not here to talk to married men. He shows time and again, he has NO respect for women or the word of God for that matter. How many young, misleadable women is this guy in communication with? This is dangerous, this man twists the word of God to fulfill what he has as a life and apparently everyone knows about it. Will/were you responsible if/when something happens? Post Reply
NRSV1953 View Profile History	To Administator: Letthismind2 - Michael Posted : 19 Jun, 2013 06:46 AM This is not an appropriate use of the Forums. Post Reply
View Profile History	To Administator: Letthismind2 - Michael Posted : 19 Jun, 2013 07:15 AM It seems rather harsh to me to criticize her as misusing the forum, when in fact she is declaring Michael's misuse of the forum. According to the Bible Jesus said to first tell the person to their face and then tell it to the congregation before doing even more. See Matthew 18:15-17 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2018:14-18&version=KJV So both CA and myself told it to Michael and asked him to do his part - and he openly refused. His profile declares him as a single man, while otherwise he tells us that he is a married man. If this is going to act like a Christian forum group then Michael is the one who is way out of line. So I say it is CA who is the one doing as a Christian, even if it is not as perfect as some people might like it. Post Reply
NRSV1953 View Profile History	To Administator: Letthismind2 - Michael Posted : 19 Jun, 2013 07:26 AM Sandman, CA is posting this on all the Forums when what she needs to do is send administration a message through the "contact us" option. This is what I posted to her elsewhere in the Forums: "Dearest Sister, IMHO, you are being too harsh on Brother Michael. I have followed his posts for quite a while now and whether you like his advice or not, he is a sincere guy. From what I have gleaned of him through his posts/responses, he is betrothed but not yet married. There is no harm in fellowship with other believers here, engaged or not. Please rethink your judgment of him. Blessings! " If I'm not mistaken, we are NOT to post individual's user names on the Forums. Post Reply
View Profile History	To Administator: Letthismind2 - Michael Posted : 19 Jun, 2013 08:20 AM He has repeatedly posted his own name on the forum, and so I do not see that as some violation of any secret identity. And it is just his first name, which he himself advertises in his postings. My name is James. Post Reply
ChristianArtsy View Profile History	To Administator: Letthismind2 - Michael Posted : 19 Jun, 2013 08:40 AM Sis, you failed to post my response which was: Received my sister, but this is a Christian's Singles sight, "Michael" posts untruths on his profile "single" and well until this morning specifically invites "YOUNG LADIES" "IN NEED" of help to contact him. sure its in his edit history, and why did he delete after my post.... I'm not out to bash him, but if I wanted to "talk" to a married man, as a single woman, I'd go on a SECULAR site where one should expect that type of environment. If I want to talk to a married man on dating, well, church, family, GOD. Ever wonder what his wife thinks... If he feels he HAS to be here, then something is wrong, that shouldn't be supported. Post Reply
View Profile History	To Administator: Letthismind2 - Michael Posted : 19 Jun, 2013 09:44 AM Me think you doth protest too much. The function of the administrators is not to police beliefs which may be unpopular (the forum members themselves kinda do that in their responses hence these replies to your post) but to ensure that the site is not misused by spammers, posts don't break the law (e.g. libel) and that verbally (textually?) abusive posts are removed. Asking them to take action against somebody because you don't agree with what they're saying or doing is beyond their remit. After reading your complaint, the only way the admins can really get involved is if LTM keeps sending you private messages after you've asked him not to - you would of course need to forward those messages on to admin, along with your message requesting him to stop. Finally, if you have a problem with another user on this site, it's simply not on to post a complaint to admin on the forum, if nothing else, for the fact that admin don't read each and every posting. As pointed out, there are links for contacting the admins direct which you should use - I have and they do work. Post Reply
View Profile History	To Administator: Letthismind2 - Michael Posted : 20 Jun, 2013 04:05 AM We need to just love CA, Whatever she is thinking or feeling it is real to her and I am sorry that you feel such toward me dear. I will not have you banned for trying to defame my reputation. To God be the Glory !!!! Michael, servant of the most high God and His people. Post Reply
DontHitThatMark View Profile History	To Administator: Letthismind2 - Michael Posted : 20 Jun, 2013 05:57 AM Sandman, there is no relationship status option on the site for "married" or "in a relationship", I don't think that counts as a lie, since he clearly states many times that he is in a relationship. I think the obvious answer is to take a step back and look at what you're doing. Yes, you only need two or three witnesses to accuse someone, but first you really need some kind of credible evidence in support of your accusations as well. A bunch of people screaming to crucify someone doesn't mean they're justified or that the person is guilty of anything. :peace::peace: Post Reply
View Profile History	To Administator: Letthismind2 - Michael Posted : 20 Jun, 2013 11:20 AM There is a completely sensible and logical reason why there is no relationship status option on the site for "married" or "in a relationship", and that obvious reason is because this is a Christian Singles Dating site. Duh. There really are dating sites for married people, just as there really are lots of married people who do fool around, and lots of people (male and females) who are quite happy to fool around with married people (husbands or wives). There are some Christians (not just Mormons) who see it as okay to have 2 or 3 or more wives, because the Patriarch Jacob had 4 wives and God blessed them all. So if Michael can hook himself another wife then he can be justified? My understanding is that this site does not have a status for "married" or for "engaged" people is because most mainstream Christians do not approve of that kind of dating or mating. For you (DHTM) to say for a married man to put on his dating profile that he is "single" and you say that is not a lie, and you do not see that as "some kind of credible evidence" then you simply are refusing to see the obvious lie. As the scriptures declare = Eyes that do not see, and ears that do not hear, and a heart that does not understand. No one is trying to crucify him, as he tells us that he is happily married - so go be happily married, and stop playing the sinful games like this one here. That is not crucifying him, as that is a nice Christian rebuttal. Post Reply
View Profile History	To Administator: Letthismind2 - Michael Posted : 20 Jun, 2013 12:18 PM There's no site rules that only singles are allowed to use the chat forums - several people on here have since met people and became/due to become married yet stick around here purely to take part in the forums. One of the OP's original complaints was that she doesn't want to read responses from somebody who isn't single - that may be her preference and she's entitled to ignore LTM or anybody else's replies, but to deny them use of the site. ergo the forum because they're not single is going too far. As for the polygamy issue, if LTM was seeking another female then you'd be right to flag this up, however he himself has said more than once that he's NOT looking for anyone to have a relationship with. You or I may not like the tone of his postings, but until he breaks site rules, he has as much right to be here as us. Post Reply

First

Page : 1 2

Next  9 >>

Last