Author	Thread: Why baby/child in picture
Admin	Why baby/child in picture Posted : 10 Apr, 2011 05:37 PM Ok why are there a bunch of profiles of men, that are not fathers, but have pictures of them holding little babies or children. It's kind of annoying. Like they think because they can take a picture with a cute kid, that it makes them special. lol. I think it kinda makes them creepy. :ROFL: :nahnah: Post Reply
View Profile History	Why baby/child in picture Posted : 11 Apr, 2011 04:44 PM Consider yourself warned, brother VKWV1! Post Reply
VKWV1 View Profile History	Why baby/child in picture Posted : 11 Apr, 2011 05:43 PM No, no - you are fine. Human photos 6-1/2, canine photos 1-1/2. A good ratio for those of us who don't drink from the toilet. Post Reply
View Profile History	Why baby/child in picture Posted : 11 Apr, 2011 06:53 PM (giggle) You are so funny! What I meant was that if there are more pictures of "Fang" than there are of her, consider yourself forewarned! Post Reply
View Profile History	Why baby/child in picture Posted : 12 Apr, 2011 05:36 AM hmmm I dont know about pets. But if a guy has a picture of him and a chiuahuah. OHhh man. That is so cute. Post Reply
cornettsr45 View Profile History	Why baby/child in picture Posted : 12 Apr, 2011 06:57 AM Excuse me,, But I do believe that dog has a toothache,, Can't you feel his pain? lol Poor puppy,, sooo young and already has to wear a retainer, Who's gonna be sceered of a dog with dental issues ? He ain't bitin nobody,, lol Post Reply
View Profile History	Why baby/child in picture Posted : 12 Apr, 2011 10:06 AM Watch it, Cornett! You have yet to meet my "guard dog." (giggle) Post Reply
cornettsr45 View Profile History	Why baby/child in picture Posted : 12 Apr, 2011 01:49 PM It may be wiser to BEWARE of the Owner, rather than the dawg,, Confuscius says,, Lady with beagle dog may have bark worse than bite,, lol or was it,, bites harder than dog? hmmm, I wonder,,,lol Post Reply
IaoKim View Profile History	Why baby/child in picture Posted : 12 Apr, 2011 02:02 PM I have lots of pictures of me and my nephew as a baby during all the times I was feeding or playing with him (he is now 4). The "awwww" effect that babies have on girls has not gone unnoticed to me. It certainly is an effective means of getting a girl's attention. But is it ethical for guys to use the babies in their lives just to pick up chicks? At what point does persuasion become manipulation? Are guys with baby pictures becoming like the Sophists-- seeking to persuade their audience at all cost!? What good is it for a guy to persuade a woman, yet for him to lose his own soul in the process!? Something to think about . . . haha :rolleyes: Post Reply
View Profile History	Why baby/child in picture Posted : 12 Apr, 2011 02:08 PM This from a guy that is sticking his tongue out in his picture.. :ROFL: Post Reply
IaoKim View Profile History	Why baby/child in picture Posted : 12 Apr, 2011 02:22 PM Are tongue pictures an unethical form of persuasion? I didn't realize that my orange slushy tongue had such an effect on the ladies. Shame on me for thinking in my naivety it was just a goofy picture! lol Post Reply

First

<< Previous  10

Page : 1 2 3

Next  4 >>

Last