Admin
|
ARRESTED DEVELOPMENT - Playboy and the (Homo) Sexual Revolution
Posted : 19 May, 2009 11:01 AM
I believe this is the right place for this post.
This is an excerpt from Henry Makow's book - Cruel Hoax: Feminism and the New World Order. (http://savethemales.ca)
ARRESTED DEVELOPMENT - Playboy and the (Homo) Sexual Revolution
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8OJfR-qOZxw
What kind of man reads playboy? He is fastidious about his appearance, his home and his possessions. He wants as much sex as possible and chooses sexual
partners mostly on the basis of appearance. He is self-absorbed and doesn't want emotional involvement or commitment. He thinks a woman and children would
be a burden.
Does this sound like many gays? It is also the masculine ideal purveyed by Playboy magazine to men since the 1950's.
The essence of manhood is to lead and support a family. But in 1972, three out of four male college students got their ideas about masculinity from
Playboy, at an incalculable cost to themselves, women, children and society.
The similarity between the Playboy and homosexual idea is no coincidence. "The Kinsey Report" (1948) shaped current mainstream attitudes to sex.
It championed unfettered sexual expression and became the manifesto of the counterculture. It inspired Hugh Hefner to start Playboy in 1953.
Essentially "The Kinsey Report" said that aberrant sexual behavior was so common as to be normal. Thanks to Dr. Judith Reisman, we now know that Alfred
Kinsey was a homosexual and the "Kinsey Report" was based on fraudulent data.
He cruised Times Square looking for subjects. More than 25% of his sample consisted of prostutues and prison inmates including many sex offenders.
Kinsay said 10 per cent of American men were gay when in fact only two per cent were.
To prove that children have legititmate sexual needs, Kinsey and his fellow pedophiles either abused 2,000 babies and children themselves and/or
relied on data obtained in Nazi concentration camps. (Judith Reisman, "Kinsey: Crimes and COnsequences," 1998, p.312)
Alfred Kinsey pretended to be a Conservative family man. In fact, he died prematurely to orchitis, a disease associated with masturbation, impotence
and self-mutilation. He suduced his male students and forced his wife and associates to perform in homemade pornographic films. ("orchitis" Reisman,
p.278)
Reisman concludes,"America's growing libidinous pathologies... taugh in schools... and reflected in our fine and popular arts, the press, law and
public policy largely mirror the documented sexual psychopathologies of the Kinsey team itself."
Sponsored by the Rockefeller Foundation, Kinsey's goal was "to supplant what he saw as a narrow pro-creational Judeo Christian era with a promiscuous
"anything goes" by/gay pedophile paradise." (reisman, Crafting Gay Children: An Inquiry, p.4)
HEFNER'S HERO
Hugh Hefner said the Kinsey Report "produced a tremendous sexual awakening, largely because of media attention..."This shows how the elite
orchestrates social change using media hype and the power fo advertising (in Playboy.) (See Reisman, Kinsey, p.307)
With messianic ferver, Playboy took its gospel of sexual freedom to the American male who in the 1950's-1960's still consecrated sex for marriage.
Playboy's aim, the aim of all pornographers, was to hook men on the glossy fantasy. To do this, they had to prevent them from finding true
satisfaction in marriage.
In Reisman's words, "Playboy was the first national magazine to exploit college men's fears of women and family commitment. Playboy
offered itself as a reliable, comforting substitute for monogamous hetersexual love." (Judith Reisman, "Soft Porn Play Hardball," p47)
Supposed enemies, Playboy and radical feminists, found common ground in hatered of the nuclear family. As a result, society now suffers from epidemics of
family breakdown, pornography, impotence, child sexual abuse, sado-sexual violence, teen pregnancy, a cocktail of STD's and, of coruse, AIDS.
HOMOSEXUALITY
I define homosexuality as a developmental disorder caused by an inability to establish a permanent bond with a member of the opposite sex. Psychologist
Richard Cohen, in " Coming Out Straight: Understanding and Healing Homosexuality" (2000) argues it is caused when a male child fails to bond with his
father. By having sex with men, the adult gay is trying to compensate for father-love denied in adolescence.
Dr. Charles Socarides confirms that "most men caught up in same-sex sex are reacting, at an unconcsious level, to something amiss with their earliest
upbringing-over controlling mothers and abdicating fathers. Through long observation I have also learned that the supposedly liberated homosexual is
never really free. In his multiple, same sex adventures, even the most effeminate gay was looking to incorporate the manhood of others, because he was
in a compulisve, never-ending search for the masculinity that was never allowed to build and grow in early childhood."("How America Went Gay")
Psychiatrist Jeffrey Satinover has pointed to another cause of homosexuality. A 1990 survey of 1000 gays shows that an older or mroe powerful partner
physically assaulted 37% of them before the age of 19. ("Homosexuality and American Public Life," 1999, p.24)
In addition, according to Anne Moir in "Why Men Don't Iron," some men may be "born gay" due to foetal hormone imbalances. They seem to be a minority.
For many decades, gays were told that they were "sick" and cruelly persecuted. The gay activist solution: convince the world, that in fact, it is
heterosexuals who are sick. In 1973, they bullied the American Psychology Association into pronouncing homosexuality normal. It was no longer a disorder
but a healthy and normal "sexual preference." Psychiatrists who felt otherwise were ostracized. Their lectures were cancelled; their books and articles
rejected; their promotions denied. Is this the way science should work? (see on line "How America Went Gay)
SPREADING THE SICKNESS
Together with feminists, gay activists began to dismantle all heterosexual institutions: masculinity, feminity, marriage, the nuclear family, the boy
scouts sports, and the military.
Backed by the financial elite, gay activists and their supporters now largely dictate our cultural sensibility. They are partly responsible for the
puerile pornographic obsession that pervades television, music videos and the Internet. Now we all suffer from the homosexual disorder, which I believe is
arrested development.
Gay liberation manuals talk about "normalizing"" their sexuality and "de-sensitizing" straights by flaunting it. I was livid when I took my 10-year-old
son to see Adam Sandler's movie "Billy Madison" and heard on teenage male youth in the film casually ask another:"Would you rather bone Pamela Anderson
or a young Jack Nicholson?
Last week, on TV's "WIll and Grace," Jack who is gay dons an apron that says "Kiss the cook" pretending he thought the second "o" was a "c". Just as
Communists once conned do-gooders to think radicalism was chic, gay activists define trendy for gullible liberals today.
Gay and feminist activists think traditional morality was invented to prepetuate an unjust staus quo. In fact, morality is accumulated wisdom of mankind
regarding what is healthy and ultimately fulfilling. Perversion is deviation from what is healthy.
Heterosexual morality places sex in the context of love and/or marriage because it is healthy and human. It ensures that most profound and intimate
physical act between two people expresses a corresponding emotional-spiritual bond. Promiscuous sex is a desperate plea for love. Love and marriage
answer that call and provide for the natural and necessary outcome of sex, children.
CONCLUSION
With Hugh Hefner's help, Alfred Kinsey detached sex from love and procreation. Homosexual activists chamion anonymous sex: a majority of gays have
over a dozen partners each year. In less extreme form, heterosexuals have adopted this model. Recently a social columnist enviously described straight
friends whose relationships have ended: "they're our partying, having the tiem and the sex of their lives."
In conclusion, the " sexual revolution" was really a triumph of an elite program of arrested development. Courtship and sex fixation
represent a stage of life. After marriage we move on to more important things. The elite agenda is to make sex a lifelong preoccupation.
In 40 short years, almost all sexual constraints have dissolved and heterosexual society is on the defensive. Cultural and social
breakdown will only worsen unless there is a counterrevolution.
--------------------------------------------
FOOLING THEMSELVES & US - Is Gay Behaviour Sick?
Imagine that an organism is SICK. Imagine that the sick cells convince the organism that they are healthy, and the healthy cells they are sick. The
gullible organism would just get sicker.
This the relationship between society and homosexuals today. Gays argue that same-sex behavoir is no different than being left-handed. ON the other hand,
they say heterosexual behvaior is not natural, but socially conditioned and "opressive for women."
Heterosexual society and family are taking heavy casualties. Our opportunistic and craven leaders have betrayed us. We don't even know we are under
attack.
Let's decide who, in fact, is sick.
Let's look at gay behaviour as defined by two gays, Marchall Kirk and Hunter Madsen Ph.D., authors of " After the Ball: How America will Conquer its Fear
and Hatred of Gays in the 90's"(1989)
In Chapter Six, they outline "ten categories of misbehaviour," drawn from their own experiences, wide reading and thousands of hours of conversation
with hundreds of other gays. Their contention is that the gay lifestyle, (not gay sexuality mind you), "is the pits." They want gays to improve
their image by addressing "what is wrong with a lot of gays." (276)
What follows are some highlights. As you read this, ask yourself if there is another human cummunity including the Mafia that could make these
generalizations about itself. Ask yourself if heterosexuals haven't caught this disease, or at least the sniffles.
The authors say "a surprisingly high percentage" of pathological liars and con men are gay. This results from a a natural habit of self-concealment,
and leads to a stubborn self-deception about one's own gayness and it's implication.
They say gays tend to reject all forms of morality and value judgments. Gay morality boils down to "I can do whatever I want and you can go to
perdition. (If it feels good, I'll do it!)" If a gay feels like seducing a trusted friend's lover, he'll do it, justifying it as an act of "sexual
freedom" and the friend be damned.
They say gays suffer from a "narcissistic" personality disorder and give this clinical descritpion: "pathological self absorption, a need for constant
attention and admiration, lack of empathy or concern for others, quickly bored, shallow, interested in fads, seductive, overemphasis on appearance,
superficially charming, promisuous, exploitive, preoccupied with remaining youthful, relationships alternate between over idealization and devaluation."
As an example of this narcissism, the authors say "a very sizable proportion of gay men" that have been diagnosed HIV posivie continue to have
unprotected sex.
They say the majority of gays are extremely promiscuous and self-indulgent. They must continuously up the ante to achieve arousal. This begin with
alcohol and drugs and includes such "forbidden" aspects of sex as walloing in filth (fetishism and coprophilia) and sadomasochism including violence.
They say many gays have sex in public bathrooms and think it is anti-gay harassment when it is stopped. Many think they have a right to pursue
straight males, including children.
Many gays are "single minded sexual predators" fixated on youth and physical beauty alone. When ti comes to the old or ugly, gays are "the real queer
bashers." Disillusioned themselves, they are cynical about love.
"Relationships between gay men don't usually last very long." They quickly tire of their partners and fall victim to temptation. The "cheating ratio of
'married'gay males, given enough time, approaches 100%.
Even friendships are based on the sexual test and are hard to sustain. Unattractive gay men find it nearly impossible to find a friend, let
alone a lover.
.The authors say gays tend to deny reality in various ways: wishful thinking, paranoia, illogic, emotionalism and embracing crackpot ideas.
.Is there any doubt this behaviour is sick? I feel no malice toward gays. I feel the same way about people who have the flu. I want them to
get better and I don't want it to spread.
.Unforutnately, even the authors of this book are deceiving themselves. They claim that it is the gay lifestyle and NOT gay sexuality that is
"the pits". Who are they kidding? The two are inseparable.
.The authors believe "our problem is dundamentally one of a bad image with straights." Again, whom are they kidding? The problem isn't image.
The book details "a comprehensive public-relations campaign that should go a long way towards sanitizing our very unsanitary image:"
"Desensitization": flooding straight America with advertising presenting gays in the "least offensive manner possible."
"Jamming": Advertising that equates fear of gays with hatreed of Jews, Blacks and Women.
"Conversion": Presenting images of gays that look like regular folks. "The image must be the icon of normality."
They say "it makes no difference that the ads are lies" because "we are using them to... counter negative stereotypes that are every bit as
much lies." Hugh? They just said the trust was even worse than the stereotypes.
This book was written in 1989 and obviously this campaign has taken effect. Read what the authors say about it:
"By conversion, we mean something far more profoundly threatening to the American Way of LIfe [than subversion] ...We mean conversion of the
average American's emotions, mind, and will, through a planned psychological attack, in the form of propaganda fed to the nation via the media.
We mean...to turn their hatred into warm regard wheather they like it or not." (My emphasis,153)
Thus gay activist want Americans to learn that something they naturally and justifiably regard as a disorder is in fact healthy. Thus
Americans will be less able to resist their overtures whether in parks, barracks, bathrooms, classrooms or legislatures.
It is a meausre of the author's cynicism and self-deception that THEY quote psychologist M. Scott Peck, who in "People of the Lie" characterizes
people who suffer from extreme of "malignant" carcissism simply as "evil."
Evil people, Peck says, Have "an unshakable will to be right and will not consider the possibility that they are wrong...Their main weapon
, interstingly enough is the lie with which they distort reality to look good to themselves, and to confuse others." (297)
Gays can continue to fool themselves. But they won't fool us. Some of these people are evil. Their behavior is sick. And it's contagious.
Post Reply
|
