Author | Thread: Relationship Policy for CDFF | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
DontHitThatMark
View Profile History |
Relationship Policy for CDFFPosted : 21 Jun, 2013 12:15 PMUser Name: DontHitThatMark |
|||
View Profile History |
Relationship Policy for CDFFPosted : 4 Jul, 2013 06:02 AMI have to say that I realise I have come to respect you guys so much here. Djk255, Jude, Mark and sissygirl. |
|||
ChristianArtsy
View Profile History |
Relationship Policy for CDFFPosted : 4 Jul, 2013 12:52 PMPerhaps you should look up the word obsession. I think the fact that even though I've told you I prefer to not get your, um.. comments to me you still respond in one way or another and usually immediately after I've posted something, no matter what the topic.. that's obsessive, to say the least. You've also responded to me in one single forum post, over and over again.,, that'd be obsessive. I won't waste my time with the adjectives, please note, the last place I'd want to be your mind and I really couldn't care less about your relationship with your "lady". |
|||
|
||||
View Profile History |
Relationship Policy for CDFFPosted : 4 Jul, 2013 01:15 PMActually, I look into the posts for the day and I decide to respond to whatever the daily chat is about. |
|||
View Profile History |
Relationship Policy for CDFFPosted : 5 Jul, 2013 10:15 AMSandman_Hollywood is in Review for Forum Violations...xo |
|||
DontHitThatMark
View Profile History |
Relationship Policy for CDFFPosted : 5 Jul, 2013 07:23 PMChristianArtsy, honestly, there was nothing directed at you because after your initial complaint, you didn't drive it into the ground and drag everyone into an insult/accusation festival. I consider your position to be reasonable, if you don't want to hear from LTM, then you're free to note the request in any forum posting, you're free to ignore him completely, etc. There was no reason for anyone to direct any "venom" toward you. Sandman, however, went a bit far, even after the administrator stepped in and made the site's stance known. I fail to see any mistreatment of the man though, I certainly didn't harbor anything against him except frustration, and I feel like that was justified. The lengths he was going to were simply ridiculous. Also, LTM posts multiple comments on many threads, there's record of it in his forum history, it's not "obsession" directed toward you from what I can see. If you don't like what he says, then you're free to disagree and make your feelings/opinions public, but I think the slander should be over with, and I think the admin decision toward Sandman should speak for itself. Members in a relationship are tolerated on the site, certain behavior is not. |
First | << Previous 10 | Page : 1 2 3 4 5 | Last |