Yep, it seems some people claiming to be “Christians“ plan to vote for Democrat candidates like Joe Biden whose party supports killing children by abortion.
Anyone remotely familiar with abortion murder methods is well aware of the insane savagery of various abortion murder procedures.
Some babies are burned to death by a saline solution injected into the babies amniotic sac and into the mother’s uterus.
The saline solution surrounds the babies body and is inhaled in child’s tender lungs
Can anyone imagine a civil society forcing a child to inhale a saline solution!!!?? Even criminals on death row aren’t subject to such sadistic forms of capital punishment
Another abortion murder method culminates in a sadistic dismemberment that literary pulls the tiny child’s body apart limb by limb.
This procedure is declared successful after the child’s body and body parts are accounted for by reassembly outside the womb.
HOW CAN SOMEONE—ANYONE—CLAIMING THE NAME OF “CHRISTIAN“ SUPPORT SUCH A PROFANE INHUMAN PROCEDURE BY OFFERING SUPPORT to PRO-ABORTION PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE Joe Biden AND other Democrat LAWMAKERS who will continue to KEEP THIS GRIEVOUS SIN LEGAL?????
There's a belief that it is health care. Others are led by popular rhetoric that the world's population is overpopulated.
Also some believe the Democratic party is addressing more relevant issues in the American society that the red party have left unaddressed. :)
ex: "you care about lives right?.... but Murica killing civilians and getting involved in many conflicts overseas is okay? The lives of those involved in those conflicts aren't cared for. The right's rhetoric is hypocritical"
JJ, you made some statements that need some clarification.
You said, QUOTE: “There's a belief that it is health care. Others are led by popular rhetoric that the world's population is overpopulated”. END QUOTE
Where’s the proof for overpopulation?
What does, “ There's a belief that it is health care.” mean?
QUOTE “Also some believe the Democratic party is addressing more relevant issues in the American society that the red party have left unaddressed.”END QUOTE
Yes JJ, I’m sure “mothers” and “dads” consider it a “relevant issue” to hire a hit man to dispatch and dismember their unwanted children by abortion would call on the Democratic Party.
Then you say, QUOTE : “ex: "you care about lives right?.... but Murica killing civilians and getting involved in many conflicts overseas is okay? The lives of those involved in those conflicts aren't cared for. The right's rhetoric is hypocritical” END QUOTE
JJ, Is that all you can offer to justify Democrat support for the sadistic killing of millions of children by abortion?? And now you’re pretending to care about lives overseas?? What was that you said about hypocrisy??
Are you the guy who thinks Denmark is a successful socialist government ??
Out of curiosity, tell me about the conflicts overseas. Let’s see what you know about them
Hi David. Thanks for your questions. I can try to discuss it further. I'm just offering a different viewpoint and not trying to win an argument.
Where’s the proof for overpopulation? RESPONSE-Supporters of this idea usually have a different perspective on climate change than you David. They will point to food insecurity, minimal access to water, pollution, and increased unemployment especially in conflict prone Sub saharan Africa where the population will rise significantly. As a result, the overpop argument supports family planning and abortion in light that people must live in these war zones that most of us may not completely understand.
What does, “ There's a belief that it is health care.” mean? RESPONSE. This is related to the overpop argument discussed above. They generally believe abortion clinics provide family planning info so people wouldnt need to get an abortion in the first place.
QUOTE Yes JJ, I’m sure “mothers” and “dads” consider it a “relevant issue” to hire a hit man to dispatch and dismember their unwanted children by abortion would call on the Democratic Party. RESPONSE- You might be perscribing an evil motive to them for their decision. While we might disagree with them, i think we could benefit in knowing, "forgive them, for they dont know better." In theory, a Christian who is a Democrat can engage a pro-life argument in daily life with their democrat peers more easily than perhaps you can.
JJ, Is that all you can offer to justify Democrat support for the sadistic killing of millions of children by abortion?? And now you’re pretending to care about lives overseas?? What was that you said about hypocrisy?? RESPONSE- Im not offering any justification David. Im just highlighting how they do have high regard for human life outside the womb and when we go into discussion with prochoice people, we should be humble and acknowledge any red party sins. Red party folk arent saints and are equally in need of a savior.
Are you the guy who thinks Denmark is a successful socialist government ?? Out of curiosity, tell me about the conflicts overseas. Let’s see what you know about them.
RESPONSE. No David. My origin is a socialist state so the two of us likely agree on most issues. However, the way I see it, whether it be disagreement on abortion, Agent Orange, economics, republican party, or the democrat party... as Christians we can all agree that the way,the truth and the life is.....(fill in the blank) :)
For my response, I think it’s better to reply point by point in 2or more replies rather than pack it all in one single lengthy volume.
JJ—Dave QUOTE -Supporters of this idea usually have a different perspective on climate change than you David. They will point to food insecurity, minimal access to water, pollution, and increased unemployment especially in conflict prone Sub saharan Africa where the population will rise significantly. As a result, the overpop argument supports family planning and abortion in light that people must live in these war zones that most of us may not completely understand. END QUOTE
Dave, earlier you said, “I'm just offering a different viewpoint and not trying to win an argument.”
MY RESPONSE. I say this respectfully. If your objective is simply to offer a different viewpoint, you’ve done very well but, I agree about not trying to win an argument. Obviously, you can’t win by failing to defend your point of view. Dave, please take another look at what you wrote in the paragraph above. You indicate climate change proponents will point to food shortages and other things because these people live in war zones.
Dave, how does your first paragraph move your overpopulation and climate change theories forward? You case became contradictory after you introduced “conflict” and living in “war zones” as a cause for overpopulation!
Dave, how does conflict and living in a war zone cause overpopulation? None of that helps defend your point of view.
It’s sounds like your making a good case for sending in the troops to defend oppressed peoples—you might make a good Republican yet!!
I have more but I’m gonna send but feel free to weigh in anytime
David, the conflict and climate change parts makes more sense when you look at the birth rates of those particular countries which I did indeed fail to mention. Around 5 to 6 kids per woman in Nigeria or the DRC.
If a christian votes for abortion, they arent necessarily thinking with a big smile on their face, "let's kill some children." David, you might be coming to the abortion issue from a right/wrong perspective. All I'm saying is that they might come from a human-suffering viewpoint.
Getting them to understand your side would need you both to agree to some common ground in the middle. Have them leave and go to bed thinking about the issue rather than how Person X was "rude" or "unchristlike" (whatever that means to them 0.o). Anyways good discussion ... vote based on your convictions next month for those in the US.
