| Author | Thread: The Irony Evolutionary Belief | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
LittleDavid
View Profile History |
The Irony Evolutionary BeliefPosted : 4 Jan, 2020 07:01 PMI’ve often wondered why the totally absurd belief in the theory of evolution isn’t something a jungle tribe would belief rather than many educated people. |
|||
Teddyhug^
View Profile History |
The Irony Evolutionary BeliefPosted : 28 Mar, 2021 11:36 AMThe OP of this thread David writes - 'Thank you Flat Earth Teddy for stepping forward with a different form of irrationally—ie flat earth insanity where even the most obvious is denied.' |
|||
LittleDavid
View Profile History |
The Irony Evolutionary BeliefPosted : 29 Mar, 2021 11:55 AMFlat Earth TeddyBug can’t find a reliable REAL science source to quote so he SELECTIVELY quotes from the Flat Earth NCSE‼️‼️ |
|||
LittleDavid
View Profile History |
The Irony Evolutionary BeliefPosted : 29 Mar, 2021 07:39 PMMy mistake, NCSE is not a flat earth proponent. |
|||
LittleDavid
View Profile History |
The Irony Evolutionary BeliefPosted : 29 Mar, 2021 07:43 PMAt this time, however, I can say NCSE is not a reliable science resource. More to come |
|||
|
|
||||
Teddyhug^
View Profile History |
The Irony Evolutionary BeliefPosted : 31 Mar, 2021 11:02 AMIs this hilarious or what friends and readers!? |
|||
Teddyhug^
View Profile History |
The Irony Evolutionary BeliefPosted : 31 Mar, 2021 11:07 AMDavid writes - 'At this time, however, I can say NCSE is not a reliable science resource. More to come' |
|||
LittleDavid
View Profile History |
The Irony Evolutionary BeliefPosted : 31 Mar, 2021 07:14 PMSo it looks like Flat Earth TeddyBug likes Atheist’s points of view ‼️ 🥸🐞 |
|||
LittleDavid
View Profile History |
The Irony Evolutionary BeliefPosted : 31 Mar, 2021 07:17 PMNCSE, that TeddyBug uses to prove his false points of view, compares well to an Atheist Secular Humanist point of view |
|||
| First | << Previous | Page : 1 2 | Last |

I used reasoning and logic that denies obviously the religious teaching of this magical force acting upon 'bodies' and or objects in so called 'space' that makes sense in questioning but David provides NONE in examples in his thinking outside ONLY his assumed 'gravity' which is nothing but an unproven theory!
Also note David gave NO EXAMPLES of WHAT is denied in the design of the earth by observation according to him but just a general unfounded statement that something is denied!!!
What is that? 


Correct? 