What if Christians are guilty of circular reasoning?
A charge frequently leveled against the Bible is that Christians argue in circles. The charge goes that Christians claim the Bible as the inspired Word of God and, as proof, quote a passage from the Bible that says so.
This type of argumentation is known as �begging the question�, or circular reasoning. It is based on assuming something to be true, using that assumption as fact to prove another assumption and using the "proved" assumption to prove your original assumption!
Some Christians (and many non-Christians) do argue in circles, but about the Bible they certainly do not need to. Instead of assuming the Bible is the Word of God, we can begin by demonstrating that the Scriptures are reliable and trustworthy historical documents. This is confirmed by applying the ordinary test of historical criticism to the Scriptures.
After establishing that the Bible is a valid historical record, the next point is realizing that Jesus Christ claims to be the unique Son of God and that He bases this claim on His forthcoming resurrection from the dead.
Next, we examine the evidence for the resurrection contained in this historic document and find that the arguments overwhelmingly support the contention that Christ has risen from the dead. If this is true, then He is the unique Son of God as He claimed to be. If He is indeed God, then He speaks with authority on all matters.
Jesus considered the Old Testament to be the Word of God (Matthew 15:1-4; 5:17-18). Furthermore, He promised His disciples, who either wrote or had control over the writing of the New Testament books, that the Holy Spirit would bring all things back to their remembrance (John 14:26). Therefore, we can insist, with sound and accurate logic, that the Bible is God�s Word.
This is not circular reasoning. It is establishing certain facts and basing conclusions on the sound, logical outcome of these facts. The case for Christianity can be established by ordinary means of historical investigation.
On the other hand, if faced with such evidence you continue to create reasons not to believe, are you guilty of your own circular reasoning? This begins with an attitude, "The Bible cannot be true!" Then, in spite of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, one develops reasons not to believe. Are you being intellectually dishonest with yourself and others? Further, what fear is motivating you to turn from facing the truth about Christ? What do you fear giving up?
:ROFL: this article is good for such a time as this in the cintual discussion of Calvin's theology. it just keeps going round and round in circles going nowhere fast.:zzzz:
Not only has Jesus risen from the dead, Jesus was the FIRST to be raised from the dead. No one had been human and then raised to receive a resurrected spirit body before Jesus. I'm always amazed to hear preachers say that Moses and Elijah were real at the" Mount of Transfiguration" and not a vision.
I Corin 15 vs 20 : the First Fruits of those who have fallen asleep
Acts 26 vs 23 : that the Christ would suffer, THAT HE WOULD BE THE FIRST TO RISE FROM THE DEAD
Rev 1 VS 5 : and from Jesus Christ, the faithful witness, THE FIRST BORN FROM THE DEAD
and the clincher:
Col 1 vs 18 : And He is the head of the body, the church, who is the beginning, THE FIRST BORN FROM THE DEAD,
that in all things He may have the PREEMINENCE.:applause:
No one could have risen before Jesus, to say so is a gross misunderstanding of His role in our salvation.
