Author	Thread: Earn your PhD from Crackerjack University‼️‼️‼️😃🤣😎
LittleDavid View Profile History	Earn your PhD from Crackerjack University‼️‼️‼️😃🤣😎 Posted : 29 Jan, 2025 11:24 AM That’s right, everybody has their own science and their own little PhDs running around to make sure they all look educated‼️‼️‼️🤣😃😇 Post Reply
LittleDavid View Profile History	Earn your PhD from Crackerjack University‼️‼️‼️😃🤣😎 Posted : 29 Jan, 2025 12:05 PM Ok, so this charismaniac lady, who believes in fake voices from God, false miracles and fake tongues, hopes now to boost her charismaniac fortunes by claiming at least one of her teachers has a PhD‼️‼️ This ought to be good. First of all, she didn’t say what kind of PhD study her preacher pursued. Perhaps he has a PhD in nursing but he fills in as an occasional amateur soap box preacher ‼️‼️‼️🤣😃 2nd. Sometimes a PhD means nothing more than that someone has been educated beyond and above their intelligence. 3rd. If you receive a PhD in your own university echo chamber it means you’ve successfully regurgitated your leader’s ideas in a new formate. 4th. Evolutionists have many PhD “scientists”. But the number of PhD evolution prone scientists far outweighs any “scientific fact” that actually supports evolution. I guess they figure the more PhDs they generate increases the chance of uncovering the ever illusive proof for evolution. So goes the PhD moral of the story. That doesn’t mean there are not legitimate studies behind some PhD programs. Many such studies actually benefit the whole of academia. But be aware of the frauds Post Reply
Handyman62 View Profile History	Earn your PhD from Crackerjack University‼️‼️‼️😃🤣😎 Posted : 29 Jan, 2025 02:24 PM Higher education doesn't equal higher intelligence nor does higher education guarantee honesty. Far to many who seek higher education end up dumber and more dishonest than those who seek out hard work early rather than college. There's no better teacher than the school of hard knocks. Post Reply
LittleDavid View Profile History	Earn your PhD from Crackerjack University‼️‼️‼️😃🤣😎 Posted : 29 Jan, 2025 03:28 PM You’re right about that HM, especially the school of hard knocks‼️😃🤣 You can see how “higher education” under the current establishment makes fools outa college kids. Some kids go to college believing in God and come out believing in the asininity of evolution‼️‼️ Obviously these poor kids didn’t survive the apocalypse of egnimatic propaganda. Tragically, that’s just one of the fallouts of public “education”. We need to start making full scale debate, critical thinking and logic required curriculum Post Reply
regO07 View Profile History	Earn your PhD from Crackerjack University‼️‼️‼️😃🤣😎 Posted : 29 Jan, 2025 09:17 PM Yes, bring back logic as a course itself. Teach kids how to think, not what to think. Post Reply
Handyman62 View Profile History	Earn your PhD from Crackerjack University‼️‼️‼️😃🤣😎 Posted : 30 Jan, 2025 07:42 AM RegO07 I agree mostly with what you posted. The only thing I disagree with is teaching logic because I believe you are either born with logic or you're not. Actually it's more like how much logic a person is born with since it varies widely. However I do believe that by teaching critical thinking skills then an approximation of logic can be achieved. Post Reply
regO07 View Profile History	Earn your PhD from Crackerjack University‼️‼️‼️😃🤣😎 Posted : 30 Jan, 2025 10:08 AM RegO07 I agree mostly with what you posted. The only thing I disagree with is teaching logic because I believe you are either born with logic or you're not. Actually it's more like how much logic a person is born with since it varies widely. However I do believe that by teaching critical thinking skills then an approximation of logic can be achieved. Not sure why you have to state that as a disagreement. Certainly some are more naturally inclined toward critical thinking skills. However, a child's (or even an adult's) environment can lead them that way or not. However, my mention of teaching logic as a formal course shouldn't have been interpreted as the only exhaustive way of learning. It has proved a useful tool through the ages to show fallacies, and the importance of looking at things through a clear lens showing how certain angles can lead a person wrong. In not doing this, some may resort to knee-jerk reactions, following the crowd, etc. Post Reply
regO07 View Profile History	Earn your PhD from Crackerjack University‼️‼️‼️😃🤣😎 Posted : 30 Jan, 2025 10:11 AM ""RegO07 I agree mostly with what you posted. The only thing I disagree with is teaching logic because I believe you are either born with logic or you're not. Actually it's more like how much logic a person is born with since it varies widely. However I do believe that by teaching critical thinking skills then an approximation of logic can be achieved."" Not sure why you have to state that as a disagreement. Certainly some are more naturally inclined toward critical thinking skills. However, a child's (or even an adult's) environment can lead them that way or not. However, my mention of teaching logic as a formal course shouldn't have been interpreted as the only exhaustive way of learning. It has proved a useful tool through the ages to show fallacies, and the importance of looking at things through a clear lens showing how certain angles can lead a person wrong. In not doing this, some may resort to knee-jerk reactions, following the crowd, etc. (*reposted to separate who said what since these forums have no edit button) Post Reply
Handyman62 View Profile History	Earn your PhD from Crackerjack University‼️‼️‼️😃🤣😎 Posted : 30 Jan, 2025 11:46 AM Did my pointing out that logic is something you're born with offend you? Post Reply
LittleDavid View Profile History	Earn your PhD from Crackerjack University‼️‼️‼️😃🤣😎 Posted : 31 Jan, 2025 01:55 AM I agree that some form of common sense logic might be present at birth. For example, a baby seems aware of the basic principle of “cause and effect” before he can walk, talk or explain the concept. That can be demonstrated when a baby hears a sound (effect) and turns to look in the direction for the cause of the sound. In some sense, a baby’s natural born tendency might remain more advanced than an atheist’s compromised understanding of the concept. This is because the atheist willingly refuses to contemplate the concept of an UNcaused First Cause for fear of recognizing the existence of an eternal God. I agree with 0O7 that teaching logic in its entirety would benefit students with an understanding of the principles of logical reasoning, logical thinking and logical argumentation along with recognizing flawed illogical reasoning (irrational fallacies). Here’s a good example for the significance of teaching logic regarding the law of non-contradiction. The law of non-contradiction states the following: A cannot be A and not A at the same time and in the same relationship. One of the main reasons wanna be atheists come up with so many “contradictions” in the Bible is simply out of ignorance of the logical law of non-contradiction (sometimes referred to as the law of contradiction). Post Reply
LittleDavid View Profile History	Earn your PhD from Crackerjack University‼️‼️‼️😃🤣😎 Posted : 31 Jan, 2025 01:55 AM I agree that some form of common sense logic might be present at birth. For example, a baby seems aware of the basic principle of “cause and effect” before he can walk, talk or explain the concept. That can be demonstrated when a baby hears a sound (effect) and turns to look in the direction for the cause of the sound. In some sense, a baby’s natural born tendency might remain more advanced than an atheist’s compromised understanding of the concept. This is because the atheist willingly refuses to contemplate the concept of an UNcaused First Cause for fear of recognizing the existence of an eternal God. I agree with 0O7 that teaching logic in its entirety would benefit students with an understanding of the principles of logical reasoning, logical thinking and logical argumentation along with recognizing flawed illogical reasoning (irrational fallacies). Here’s a good example for the significance of teaching logic regarding the law of non-contradiction. The law of non-contradiction states the following: A cannot be A and not A at the same time and in the same relationship. One of the main reasons wanna be atheists come up with so many “contradictions” in the Bible is simply out of ignorance of the logical law of non-contradiction (sometimes referred to as the law of contradiction). Post Reply

First

Page : 1 2

Next  8 >>

Last