Why do Christians end their prayers "in Jesus name"?
Because some are superstitious. Some, because everyone else does. Some because the Bible says if they pray in Jesus's name their prayers will be answered. Some because they heard there is power in the name of Jesus.
However most Christians don't know what it means to pray in the name of Jesus and use it as a magical incantation. In Acts the sons of Sceva got their butts kicked by a demon when they tried to use the name of Jesus.
So here we have another hate thread of clueless "student Quiznos" the false teacher, slanderer and trainee of "ha Chuck's" messy-anic "church" of the doctrine of devils! Just look at Papa "ha Chuck" coming to his rescue to reassure the slander and attack on general Christianity!
Well first of all you don't even know the name of Yahuwah's Son, which is the Father's set apart WORD he later put in the flesh! Your clueless! Its not a faked, basically pagan name like "J-esus/iesus/zeus" as you keep calling him "student Quiznos" the false teacher by
your false teacher "ha Chuck"! HA!
The Bible is clear that the only way to Father Yahuwah is through His Son Yah'shua! So "student Quiznos" is clueless to the fact that we SHOULD end our prayers in Yah'shua name when we pray to Father Yahuwah! Its soooooooo simple to understand but the slander false teacher "student Quiznos" is only here to attack Christians in general.
So what is the point in all of these threads that "student Quiznos" the false "student" teacher keeps posting and "ha Chuck" the Jesuit teacher keeps supporting!? To once again put down Christians, with his slander of Christians, in claiming WHAT they are thinking
when they end prayer "in J-esus name" and so "student Quiznos"and "ha Chuck" have this mystery "spirit" in their head that tells them what ALL Christians are thinking! LMBO! Self righteous "student Quiznos" and master "ha Chuck" to the rescue, doing their best to creating hate of Christianity! But we all know what is going on and they have lost all credibility LONG AGO now!
Well I'm out of here for now! Truths hurts, does it not you two clowns?
Congratulations Teddy, you finally realize we are two different people!
Quiznos posted a Topic awhile back on the real name of Jesus. I responded in the comment section. We both agree it wasn't the modern word "Jesus". You should go back and review that thread. Because the Jewish/Aramaic earthly name of Mashiach certainly wasn't that concoction you've cooked up.
Thanks for being such an encourament,y'all come back now hear.
I do not believe your purpose on this site is to encourage others, or to exhalt the name of Messiah,your purpose it to ridicule others, and dig up past posts in order to project yourself as a righteous believer in Messiah.
Hugs, have you ever takenthe time to correct a person according to the scriptures, NO.
Do you ask questions about the posted subjects, or replies, NO you do gymnastics by jumping to delisions, and accuse others of being against the Word and being against GOD Almighty.
Ted, take a few seconds to ask questions about posts and replies instead of being self righteous with your accusations.
Pride goes before destruction, a haughty spirit before a fall.
"I do not believe your purpose on this site is to encourage others, or to exhalt the name of Messiah,your purpose it to ridicule others. take a few seconds to ask questions about posts and replies instead of being self righteous with your accusations." end quotes.
So lets see friends if we have any evidence that "student Quiznos" says he "encourages others" with his words! Does he "ridicule others" and takes on the form of self righteousness in his wording of others, judging others??? We can see below he does.
Quiznos as Chuck posts about Parehtban - "What is the nickname for a detective D-ICK"
Quiznos as Chuck posts about Richard7744 - "What is the nickname for the name Richard D-ICK."
"Congratulations Teddy, you finally realize we are two different people!"
Man you cannot comprehend anything can you, let alone The Bible! I'm saying you "two" are one and the same, meaning your shadow self "ha Chuck" is "Quiznos" and that's why the quotation marks about your numerious names and profiles! Typical assumption on your part again just like your slander of general Christianity you and your shadow self will never change!
ha Chuck writes,
"Quiznos posted a Topic awhile back on the real name of Jesus. I responded in the comment section. We both agree it wasn't the modern word "Jesus". You should go back and review that thread." end quote.
Man are you ignorant! Does it matter what your twin self posted before, the point is you as "Quiznos" ARE STILL calling "G_d Almighty" which is a pagan diety, then calling Yah'usha like "J-esus/iesus/zeus" while claiming "We both agree it wasn't the modern word "Jesus". SOOOOO why keep doing so then you FALSE TEACHER! WOW! Clueless much?
Self appointed forum word study ha Chuck writes,
"Because the Jewish/Aramaic earthly name of Mashiach certainly wasn't that concoction you've cooked up." end quote.
That is debatable and not the point, clarified above that YOU keep calling the Father and Son false names and only become argumentative to distract from the point when it benefits (in your selfish mind) you! Assumptions that you have truth on the Creator's true names, when you are clueless, So YOU YET keep using OBVIOUS pagan diety and pagan interpretations for names! So there is your "concoction you've cooked up" with your pagan names and meanings! LMBO!
I believe you are a calvanist, as calvanists do not believe CINTEXT, and truth are necessary when talking about what someone had written or posted here.
Quiznos as Chuck posts about Parehtban - "What is the nickname for a detective D-ICK"
Quiznos as Chuck posts about Richard7744 - "What is the nickname for the name Richard D-ICK."
hugs, you sure do want to make yourself look righteous by not posting the entire reply in its right context.
That is ok, thats what i should expect from a calvanist.
Hugs, you remind me of someone that had their account deleted recently.
Hey hugs, I believe "CINTEXT" (translation - SINTEXT), and truth are necessary when talking about what someone had written or posted here.
Quiznos as Chuckk posts about Parehtban - "What is the nickname for a detective D-ICK"
Quiznos as Chuckk posts about Richard7744 - "What is the nickname for the name Richard D-ICK."
"Quiznos" writes - "hugs, you sure do want to make yourself look righteous by not posting the entire reply in its right context."
"That is ok, thats what i should expect. Hugs, you remind me of someone that had their account deleted recently."
end quotes.
The "Quiznos" requested Sintext thread - Biblical discussion "Setting the record straight (people with evil thoughts don't see truth)" Grace Posted : 5 Feb, 2020 10:21 AM
"Quiznos" writes - Ban,
I want to use the same detective you claim to have.
What is the nickname for a detective D-ICK
What is the nickname for the name Richard D-ICK.
There you have it people one pathetic person using 2 different id's
If you lack wisdom ask GOD Almighty......
End quotes.
So there you go "Quiznos" on your requested Sintext thread and where it is found, even to the day you posted it! Is the SIN-TEXT obvious to the context of what you meant in name calling to Parehtban and Richard??? What did you think it would be or did you think I would not look it up to expose your sin or your SIN-TEXT on this CHRISTIAN forum dude!
Just because Parehtban was showing evidence of your profile, you claim its ok to call him names??? Or how about Richard, do you think its ok to call him names because he says you are posting "satanic" doctrine (according to him anyway) and that gives you the right to call him a D-ICK also??? Really "Quiznos" is that your defense that Richard's "name calling" is to be responded by more DIRECT SECULAR name calling like D-ICK??? Two wrongs make a right "Quiznos"???
Finally "Quiznos writes,
"Hugs, you remind me of someone that had their account deleted recently." end quote.
So Friends, who do you think should also be banned from this forum, to have their account deleted now???
keeps supporting!? To once again put down Christians, with his slander of Christians, in claiming WHAT they are thinking 
