Author Thread: King James Bible more accurate than the Original languages?! Huh? What?!
Admin


King James Bible more accurate than the Original languages?! Huh? What?!
Posted : 15 Feb, 2020 08:15 AM

King James Onlyist people believe the KJV is the ONLY God inspired version of the Bible. (even though there are many revisions of the KJV). They go so far to say: When the King James Bible was written, God corrected all the mistakes found in the original texts. Good grief, what is next? A flat earth? Ummm.....yeah, actually, yes.

Post Reply

KJVonly

View Profile
History
King James Bible more accurate than the Original languages?! Huh? What?!
Posted : 15 Feb, 2020 12:23 PM

The KJV falls into the category of the received majority text. I do have other translations other than the KJV .

You love to use your buzzwords to discredit any critical thinking debates that confirm the bible you call a "slow eating cancer"

Post Reply

T0TH3M4X

View Profile
History
King James Bible more accurate than the Original languages?! Huh? What?!
Posted : 15 Feb, 2020 01:50 PM

KJV is a translation. Originals are always more accurate, but it's a fair translation. I think as we get more translations, they are becoming less and less accurate and exist more with human biases.

Post Reply



View Profile
History
King James Bible more accurate than the Original languages?! Huh? What?!
Posted : 15 Feb, 2020 02:52 PM

"The KJV falls into the category of the received majority text."

There is NO SUCH THING! The "recieved text" is lost to antiquity and the "majority text" is a recent development, dependent on surviving Texts (their age and environment).

Post Reply

1Andrew1

View Profile
History
King James Bible more accurate than the Original languages?! Huh? What?!
Posted : 15 Feb, 2020 05:49 PM

This is a strange framing of what us King James Bible believers supposedly believe. I'm not even sure what this sentence means. What is believed is that the King James Bible is a perfect translation. It is more accurate than any currently existing Hebrew or Greek text. The objection to this would be that perfect translations are impossible, which is quickly refuted by Acts 22, where Luke translated Paul's Hebrew speech into Greek in the original inerrant text. God is not obliged to preserve His word in any particular language. All evidence points to the Reformation Bible written in the worlds dominant language. You don't need to have a degree in Hebrew or Greek to have a strong understanding of God's word. All you need to do is diligently and prayerfully study it in the common tongue.

Post Reply



View Profile
History
King James Bible more accurate than the Original languages?! Huh? What?!
Posted : 15 Feb, 2020 07:00 PM

Andrew writes: " It is more accurate than any currently existing Hebrew or Greek text. The objection to this would be that perfect translations are impossible, which is quickly refuted by Acts 22, where Luke translated Paul's Hebrew speech into Greek in the original inerrant text."

---------------

Andrew, care to unpack that? (I don't feel the objection is refuted by Acts 22)

Post Reply

1Andrew1

View Profile
History
King James Bible more accurate than the Original languages?! Huh? What?!
Posted : 15 Feb, 2020 07:51 PM

Andrew writes: " It is more accurate than any currently existing Hebrew or Greek text. The objection to this would be that perfect translations are impossible, which is quickly refuted by Acts 22, where Luke translated Paul's Hebrew speech into Greek in the original inerrant text."



---------------



Andrew, care to unpack that? (I don't feel the objection is refuted by Acts 22)



The objection that perfect translations are impossible is refuted by Acts 22 (Unless you deny that the original scriptures were perfect) since it shows that the perfect original copies of the scriptures themselves contained their own translations.

Post Reply

1Andrew1

View Profile
History
King James Bible more accurate than the Original languages?! Huh? What?!
Posted : 15 Feb, 2020 08:01 PM

Andrew writes: " It is more accurate than any currently existing Hebrew or Greek text. The objection to this would be that perfect translations are impossible, which is quickly refuted by Acts 22, where Luke translated Paul's Hebrew speech into Greek in the original inerrant text."



---------------



Andrew, care to unpack that? (I don't feel the objection is refuted by Acts 22)



The objection that perfect translations are impossible is refuted by Acts 22 (Unless you deny that the original scriptures were perfect) since it shows that the perfect original copies of the scriptures themselves contained their own translations.

Post Reply



View Profile
History
King James Bible more accurate than the Original languages?! Huh? What?!
Posted : 16 Feb, 2020 03:30 AM

"Unless you deny that the original scriptures were perfect"

The original Scriptures and their subsequent translations are perfect for G-D's use. However that doesn't make them inerrant (without error). The King James is a pretty good literal English translation, no more and no less.

Post Reply