Copy and paste article by David Daniels is as follows.
Start article
KING JAMES BIBLE A MAJOR OBSTACLE TO THE NEW WORLD ORDER
A Google search for "New World Order" turns up thousands of references. People love to talk about the New World Order, (NWO). What do they mean?
In the simplest form, it is two things:
1. A world without God.
2. A world without reminders of God.
Prominent occultist Manly Palmer Hall was deeply into the New World Order. He wrote about the NWO —and showed what the King James Bible has to do with it.
Hall wrote about many religions. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, a 33rd Degree Mason, loved Hall`s occultic, NWO teachings. Forty-seven years after Hall wrote about Masonry, he was given an honorary 33rd degree. The man had major connections and lots of money.
During World War II, over a year before the USA bombed Japan, Manly P. Hall considered how to make one world government:
"In the next ten years we will have to rebuild a world civilization. I hope for some psychologists and even philosophers to be among those appointed to administer this problem.... We will sit at a council table and figure how to iron out the troubles on the earth. ...no postwar program can be successful unless at least three and probably five generations of social conditioning goes with it."
Hall foresaw five generations of conditioning, starting in first grade, needed to "create a world capable of mental and emotional tolerance."
Now look what Hall claimed is "erroneous" thinking.
"To make things right we will have to undo much that is cherished error. The problem of revising the Bible shows how difficult it is to do this. For the last hundred years we have been trying to get out an edition of the Bible that is reasonably correct; but nobody wants it. What`s wanted is the good old King James version, every jot and tittle of it, because most people are convinced that God dictated the Bible to King James in English." (Emphasis mine.)
Never mind that he lied about King James Bible-believers. Catch what he said?
Who is "we"? Hall is an occultist! Who was he involved with? And what did "they" do to the Bible, from the 1840s-1940s? The only "Bible" supposedly found in the 1840s was Codex Sinaiticus. Why is an occultist, who disbelieves the Bible, concerned with "fixing" it? If he got rid of the King James Bible, what would go in its place? "Psychology can be the basic science of human tolerance..."
Psychology from grade one and teaching "tolerance" sounds like today!
Hall is right. For a new world order, you`d need people conditioned from childhood, like the Nazis conditioned German kids. (He actually wrote that, too.) And for "tolerance," you need people who will "go with the flow."
But Christians are like big, bright buoys in the water, who, Hall would say, were anchored to the "jot and tittle" of the King James Bible. So Hall hoped to "free" you from the solid anchor of the King James, so you`d "flow with" his New World Order.
In his Students Monthly Letter, Fourth Year, No. 12, Hall elaborated:
"Examine several editions of the Christian Bible.... the polyglots, and get a parallel Greek-English text.... We will discover numerous errors and alternative renderings.... Read the Vulgate, the Septuagint.... You will see the uselessness of picking phrases to pieces and trying to think in terms of 'jots and tittles.`"
It doesn`t matter what they "free" you to. All that matters to them is what they get you from: The King James Bible, God`s holy and preserved words in English.
Either trust God`s holy words, or "free yourself" —to be a slave to the New World Order. For more information, see the short video "Why the NWO Hates the KJV".
End article
Here are just a few of occultist tampering with the Holy Word of God.
KJV
18 For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God.
Key word to notice. ARE SAVED
KJV 1611
8 For the preaching of the Crosse is to them that perish, foolishnesse: but vnto vs which are saued, it is the power of God.
The text agrees. Good.
Wow! the KJV21 (century) even agrees!
18 For the preaching of the cross is foolishness to those who perish; but unto us who are saved, it is the power of God.
Now the NIV
Christ Crucified Is God’s Power and Wisdom
18 For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God. 19 For it is written:
“I will destroy the wisdom of the wise;
the intelligence of the intelligent I will frustrate.”[c]
WOW! did it say the same thing???
Who are BEING saved????
So now it's a process??
Ok, so how about the blood atonement passages..let's see.
Good ol KJV
13 Who hath deliuered vs from the power of darkenesse, and hath translated vs into the kingdome of his deare Sonne,
14 In whom we haue redemption through his blood, euen the forgiuenesse of sinnes:
15 Who is the image of the inuisible God, the first borne of euery creature.
16 For by him were all things created that are in heauen, and that are in earth, visible and inuisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him.
Through HIS BLOOD notice.
Now NIV
Verse 14
14 in whom we have redemption, the forgiveness of sins.
NO BLOOD!!! WHAT???
Look it up for yourselves on biblegateway and Kingjamesbibleonline in a google search! Compare!!
Ok , another Blood passage
KJV1611
But if wee walke in the light, as he is in the light, wee haue fellowship one with another, and the blood of Iesus Christ his Sonne clenseth vs from all sinne.
KJV
But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin.
It agrees Good! JESUS CHRIST
Now what does the false bible say??
7 But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, his Son, purifies us from all[a] sin.
No CHRIST mentioned.
Christ means Annointed!
Another Jesus as Paul warned about .
2 Corinthians 11:4
King James Version
For if he that cometh preacheth another Jesus, whom we have not preached, or if ye receive another spirit, which ye have not received, or another gospel, which ye have not accepted, ye might well bear with him.
Speaking of Gospel
KJV
For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
NIV
By this gospel you are saved, if you hold firmly to the word I preached to you. Otherwise, you have believed in vain.
3 For what I received I passed on to you as of first importance[a]: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, 4 that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures,
Seems to agree except for one key word..HOW....
how that Christ died for our sins.
Death burial and resurrection is just fine but HOW he died is important.
He died for you,
It was God's blood
It was on the cross at Calvary
He was a propitiation for your sins,
He was sinless . He paid your debt that he did not owe to restore mankind back to the Father because of sin that separated us. Now you can have Christ's righteousness imputed to you .
Paul speaking to the Phillipians:
8 Yea doubtless, and I count all things but loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord: for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and do count them but dung, that I may win Christ,
9 And be found in him, not having mine own righteousness, which is of the law, but that which is through the faith of Christ, the righteousness which is of God by faith:
10 That I may know him, and the power of his resurrection, and the fellowship of his sufferings, being made conformable unto his death;
11 If by any means I might attain unto the resurrection of the dead.
According to his profile gracewithoutworkssaves is a 50 year old truck driver with only a high school education who wants to meet and marry an **ASIAN** girl between the ages of 18 and 45; and therefore had no course in in learning the language of the New Testament which is Koine Greek which is not taught in high school.
God chose Koine Greek because it is by far the easiest language to translate and has an amazing 456 verb endings making it by far the most exact language. "I would have gone fishing," is just one word in Koine Greek!! Even the Old Testament was translated into Koine Greek in the Septuagint version in the 3rd Century BC. Every Old Testament quote in the New Testament is an exact quote from the Koine Greek Septuagint version.
I studied Koine Greek in college and am not a Koine Greek scholar but I know how to find out the exact meaning of a word in the New testament in Koine Greek by the use of my concordances which include the Koine Greek and by knowing exactly where to go on the internet.
GNWS claims that a **DISCIPLE** is just a "learner" or "student", but when you explore all the verses mentioning disciples in the New Testament we find out that disciples are **MUCH MORE** than just learners or students:
gracenotworkssaves Quote:
"Richard, since you believe there are ONLY MINOR errors in the English translations, then give the correct translation of the following scripture."
Matthew 28 verses 18- 20: And Jesus came up and spoke to them, saying, "All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth. "Go therefore and make **DISCIPLES** {Should be learners or students} of all the nations, baptizing {Should be immersing} them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age."
However, in Christianity, **DISCIPLE** is **MUCH MORE** than a learner or student and primarily refers to a dedicated follower of Jesus. In the ancient world a disciple is a follower or adherent of a teacher. It is not the same as being a student in the modern sense. A disciple in the ancient biblical world actively imitated both the life and teaching of the master. It was a deliberate apprenticeship which made the fully formed disciple a living copy of the master. A Christian disciple is a believer who follows Christ and then offers his own imitation of Christ as model for others to follow. A disciple is first a believer who has exercised faith. This means they have experienced conversion and put Jesus at the center of their life and participated in rites of Christian imitation. A fully developed disciple is also a leader of others who attempts to pass on this faith to his followers, with the goal of repeating this process.
I Peter 1:23-25: You have been **BORN AGAIN THROUGH THE LIVING AND ENDURING **WORD OF GOD**!! All men are like grass, and all their glory is like the flowers of the field, the grass withers and the flowers fall, but the **WORD OF THE LORD STANDS FOREVER**. And this is the **WORD** that was preached to you. {Which GNWS claims is full of **ERRORS**}
John 17:17: Jesus prays to His Father, "Sanctify them by the Truth, **YOUR WORD IS TRUTH**!" {Which GNWS claims is full of **ERRORS**}
2 Timothy 3:15,16: 4:1,2: You have known the **HOLY SCRIPTURES**, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. **ALL SCRIPTURE IS GOD-BREATHED** and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work. In the presence of God and of Christ Jesus, who will judge the living and the dead, and in view of His appearing and His kingdom, I give you this charge: **PREACH THE WORD**!! {**Which GNWS claims is full of **ERRORS**} Be prepared in season and out of season, correct, rebuke and encourage--with great patience and careful instruction. For the time will come when people {Like GNWS & Teddyhugger} will not put up with sound doctrine!
God chose Koine Greek because it is by far the easiest language to translate and has an amazing 456 verb endings making it by far the most exact language. "I would have gone fishing," is just one word in Koine Greek!! Even the Old Testament was translated into Koine Greek in the Septuagint version in the 3rd Century BC. Every Old Testament quote in the New Testament is an exact quote from the Koine Greek Septuagint version.
I can see where that may be true. So why do my 1526 and 1611 differ on some words.?
My 1526 says it is interpreted as the "Place of dead men's skulls" or in proper 1526 rendering, "22 And they brought him to a place named Golgotha (which is by interpretacion the place of deed mens scoulles)
Yep, that is the way they spoke back then. Shakespearian , isn't it? Another reason why I love the King James version. It is so poetic.
Now 1611
22 And they bring him unto the place Golgotha, which is, being interpreted, The place of a skull. 23
Hmmm. Dead men's skulls or Place of A skull. Emphasis mine.
Robert Cornuke has been taking the interpretation of scripture of place of A skull and finding the true location (or so he claims) of Calvary. Interesting photo he promotes of said Calvary taken in the 1860's supposedly showing the tombs that were opened up when the earth quaked and Jesus died on the cross. Do a google search and he has a lecture on youtube. He has teamed up with Prophecy Watchers, so I don't know if I can trust his findings. And people wonder why it was so easy to be deceived back in the first century with lying signs and wonders.
Interesting because Cornuke says it was a place of counting tax collection heads. But somewhere I heard it was where David killed Goliath. Don't know if that is true. Food for further study!!
"What`s wanted is the good old King James version, every jot and tittle of it, because most people are convinced that God dictated the Bible to King James in English."
It is interesting to note that King James had more **GAY BOYFRIENDS** than all of the English kings put together and was definately not a born again Christian. So some people say it should be called the King Jamie Bible. The translaters of the King Jamie Bible were all English Episcopalians which had some Roman Catholic and liberal beliefs. The King James Bible was written in 16th Century English which is hard for many Americans to understand. And still God has used the King James Bible to convert and sanctify many born again Christians.
The Kimg James Bible has some bad errors such as not putting this footnote after Mark 16:8: "The earliest manuscripts and some other ancient witnesses **DO NOT HAVE** Mark 16:9-20!" **ALL OTHER BIBLE TRANSLATIONS** have added this important footnote after Mark 16:8 which warns about Mark 16:9-20!!
For Mark 16:17,18: states : Jesus says, "And these signs will accompany those who believe: In My name they will drive out demons, they will speak in new tongues. They will pick up snakes with their hands {???} and when they drink deadly poison {???}, it will not hurt them at all, they will place hands on sick people, and they get well."????
The Pentocostals and charismatics of course love these verses and many teach that if you don't speak in tongues you are not really saved.??? They also have many Satanic Evangelists and pastors who lay hands on people to supposedly drive out demons and heal people??? There have been many Pentecostals and Charismatics who have died picking up deadly snakes and drinking deadly poison thinking that Mark 16:17,18 in the King James version was inspired by God!!
I prefer the NIV 1984 version since all of the translaters were conservative Evangelicals or belonged to the conservative Christian Reformed Church which had the best Jewish and Hebrew Bible scholars. However in 1999 the Christian Reformed church split between the conservative and more liberal believers who believed in women pastors and elders etc. Then came the NIV 2011 version which had some liberal Bible scholars; and had a more symbolic view of Revelation. And so they called 666 and the False Prophet of 666 **IT** instead of **HE**. And whenever brother is mentioned in the Bible they added brother **AND SISTER* about 100 times. Other than those 2 changes the 2 versions are fairly close but whenever the 2 versions disagree I always quote the 1984 NIV version!
It is interesting to note that King James had more **GAY BOYFRIENDS** than all of the English kings put together
End quote.
Not surprised you would say that as King James was slandered much in his life time and of course almost assassinated!
The Gunpowder Plot of 1605, in earlier centuries often called the Gunpowder Treason Plot or the Jesuit Treason, was a failed assassination attempt against King James I by a group of provincial English Catholics led by Robert Catesby.
He was a happily married man. He lifted up the worth of his wife and loved his kids.
The guy who created that rumor of him being gay waited 15 years after James death and no one was there to defend him. His bedroom was his most secure place. When business affairs of state were held, he had them in that location with guards . He leaned on people from a physical malady and caused people to imagine things. He was not a homosexual .Even if he was a devil they gave that name King James to the bible in the 1800's. So it doesn't matter.
Common bible, english bible, authorized version I think it was called prior to that.
KJVonly: To find out if King James was a homosexual just type in "Was King James 1607 a homosexual." You will find dozens of articles showing that King James was a Homosexual including an article in Wikipedia which is known for their extremely honest reporting.
Wikipedia can be changed. Even my daughter knew that in school.!
Wikipedia is a wiki, meaning anyone can edit any unprotected page and improve articles immediately. You do not need to register to do this, and anyone who has edited is known as a Wikipedian or editor. Small edits add up, and every editor can be proud to have made Wikipedia better for all.
Tyndale quickly showed a talent for Hebrew, Greek, Latin and several modern European languages including German, French, Italian and Spanish. As a scholar and a linguist, it was natural for him to want to translate the Bible into English. But translating the Bible into English was still regarded as heresy, and the Bible in English was still a banned book. Tyndale told the Church leaders of the day about his desire to translate the Bible into English, and he was met with hostility, animosity and bitter hatred. In a clash with an ordained clergyman, Tyndale issued his immortal words:
I defy the Pope, and all his laws, and if God spare my life, ere many years, I will cause a boy that driveth the plough shall know more of the Scriptures than thou dost. (William Tyndale)
William Tyndale's translating abilities were outstanding. Many other English Bible versions were to come on the scene following his death. But none of these versions ever matched the quality of Tyndale's Bible -- except those that included Tyndale's work verbatum. It has been said that 90% of Tyndale's work ended up in the King James Version, which was published some 75 years later. His decision to use original Hebrew and Greek texts, not the Latin Vulgate or some other translation, made for a Bible that was highly accurate. And his skillful translating ability made a Bible that was easily readable. It is with great respect for his devotion and committment that William Tyndale is called "The Father of the English Bible."
As Tyndale was dying, as he gasped his last dying breaths, even as copies of his New Testament were rolling off the printing press into the hands of eager readers of the Bible, Tyndale uttered a final heart-felt prayer to the God of Heaven whom he had served, and to whom he had laid down his life in the ultimate sacrifice:
Lord, open the eyes of the king of England! (William Tyndale)
Just as Tyndale's former prayer was answered, that a boy that driveth the plough would know more of the Scriptures than the Church authorities, so too was Tyndale's latter prayer answered in full measure. The tide of history was changing. Soon, in England, followed by the entire English-speaking world, the Bible (in English) would be respected, treasured, promoted and honoured. Wycliffe and Tyndale gave their lives for this moment. Their memories live on, their work remembered, their sacrifice not in vain, and their Bibles forming an immortal chain of jewels that would lead to God's Word being an unstoppable witness against this evil and adulterous generation.
Zach! You got me rolling on the floor in laughter!!! Thanks for breaking up the monotony as it is 2 am!!
Your quote
The KJV is NOT the majority Text!
End quote
Edward F. Hills argues that the principle that God provides truth through scriptural revelation, necessarily also implies that God must ensure a preserved transmission of the correct revealed text, continuing into the Reformation era of biblical translation and printing. For Hills, the task of biblical scholarship is to identify the particular line of preserved transmission through which God is acting; a line which he sees in the specific succession of manuscript copying, textual correction and printing, which culminated in the Textus Receptus and the King James Bible. Hills argues that the principle of providentially preserved transmission guarantees that the printed Textus Receptus must be the closest text to the Greek autographs; and consequently he rejects readings in the Byzantine Majority Text where these are not maintained in the Textus Receptus. He goes so far as to conclude that Erasmus must have been providentially guided when he introduced Latin Vulgate readings into his Greek text and even argues for the authenticity of the Comma Johanneum.
Hence the true text is found not only in the text of the majority of the New Testament manuscripts but more especially in the Textus Receptus and in faithful translations of the Textus Receptus, such as the King James Version. In short, the Textus Receptus represents the God-guided revision of the majority text.[21]
The Textus Receptus was mainly established on a basis of manuscripts of the Byzantine text-type, also called 'Majority text', and usually is identified with it by its followers.
Zach quote
You've copied and pasted a bunch of stuff you don't even understand. Why don't you just hang a sign around your neck that says "I'm dum and want to stay that way"
End quote
Thanks for helping me study to show myself approved unto God.
Zach quote
You really are a wack-a-doodle nut case. No wonder you think the earth is flat.
End quote
Earth is a Disk/Circle, not a ball: Isaiah 40:22, Proverbs 8:27, Job 38:13-14
Earth is fixed and immovable: 1 Chronicles 16:30, Psalm 33:9, Psalm 93:1, Psalm 96:10, Psalm 104:5, Psalm 119:89-90, Isaiah 14:7, Isaiah 45:18, Zechariah 1:11, Hebrews 11:10, 2 Peter 3:5
Earth Measured with a Line, not a curve: Job 38:4-5
Do you really think the sun is 92.96 million miles away. What does your eyes tell you when you look up.? The best possessions of man are his senses; and, when he uses them all, he will not be deceived in his survey of nature. It is only when some one faculty or other is neglected or abused that he is deluded.
Water always finds it's level on the surface.
How come you can see 7 states from the top of Lookout Mt. TN.?
The lights which are exhibited in lighthouses are seen by navigators at distances at which, according to the scale of the supposed "curvature" given by astronomers, they ought to be many hundreds of feet, in some cases, down below the line of sight!
Surveyors' operations in the construction of railroads, tunnels, or canals are conducted without the slightest "allowance" being made for "curvature," although it is taught that this so-called allowance is absolutely necessary! This is a cutting proof that Earth is not a globe.
As the mariners' compass points north and south at one time, and as the North, to which it is attracted is that part of the Earth situated where the North Star is in the zenith, it follows that there is no south "point" or "pole" but that, while the centre is North, a vast circumference must be South in its whole extent. This is a proof that the Earth is not a globe.
The surveyor's plans in relation to the laying of the first Atlantic Telegraph cable, show that in 1665 miles - from Valentia, Ireland, to St . John's, Newfoundland - the surface of the Atlantic Ocean is a LEVEL surface - not the astronomers' "level," either! The authoritative drawings, published at the time, are a standing evidence of the fact, and form a practical proof that Earth is not a globe.
If the Earth were a globe, it would, if we take Valentia to be the place of departure, curvate downwards, in the 1665 miles across the Atlantic to Newfoundland, according to the astronomers' own tables, more than three hundred miles; but, as the surface of the Atlantic does not do so - the fact of its levelness having been clearly demonstrated by Telegraph Cable surveyors, - it follows that we have a grand proof that Earth is not a globe.
When the Sun crosses the equator, in March, and begins to circle round the heavens in north latitude, the inhabitants of high northern latitudes see him slimming round their horizon and forming the break of their long day, in a horizontal course, not disappearing again for six months, as he rises higher and higher in the heavens whilst he makes his twenty-four hour circle until June, when he begins to descend and goes on until he disappears beyond the horizon in September. Thus, in the northern regions, they have that which the traveler calls the "midnight Sun," as he sees that luminary at a time when, in his more southern latitude, it is always midnight. If, for one-half the year, we may see for ourselves the Sun making horizontal circles round the heavens, it is presumptive evidence that, for the other half-year, he is doing the same, although beyond the boundary of our vision. This, being a proof that Earth is a plane, is, therefore, a proof that the Earth is not a globe.
