Author Thread: Infant Baptism in Early Church History
Admin


Infant Baptism in Early Church History
Posted : 10 Jun, 2010 02:52 PM

Infant Baptism in Early Church History

by Dennis Kastens



From the beginning of New Testament Christianity at the Feast of Pentecost (Acts 2: 38-39) to our time, unbroken and uninterrupted; the church has baptized babies. Entire households (Jewish, proselytes and Gentiles) were baptized by Christ�s original 12 Apostles (I Corinthians 1: 16; Acts 11: 14, 16: 15, 33, 18: 8) and that practice has continued with each generation.



The Early Church



Polycarp (69-155), a disciple of the Apostle John, was baptized as an infant. This enabled him to say at his martyrdom. "Eighty and six years have I served the Lord Christ" (Martyrdom of Polycarp 9: 3). Justin Martyr (100 - 166) of the next generation states about the year 150, "Many, both men and women, who have been Christ�s disciples since childhood, remain pure at the age of sixty or seventy years" (Apology 1: 15). Further, in his Dialog with Trypho the Jew, Justin Martyr states that Baptism is the circumcision of the New Testament.



Irenaeus (130 - 200), some 35 years later in 185, writes in Against Heresies II 22: 4 that Jesus "came to save all through means of Himself - all. I say, who through him are born again to God - infants and children, boys and youth, and old men."



Church Councils and Apologists



Similar expressions are found in succeeding generations by Origen (185 - 254) and Cyprian (215 - 258) who reflect the consensus voiced at the Council of Carthage in 254. The 66 bishops said: "We ought not hinder any person from Baptism and the grace of God..... especially infants. . . those newly born." Preceding this council, Origen wrote in his (Commentary on Romans 5: 9: "For this also it was that the church had from the Apostles a tradition to give baptism even to infants. For they to whom the divine mysteries were committed knew that there is in all persons a natural pollution of sin which must be done away by water and the Spirit."



Elsewhere Origen wrote in his Homily on Luke 14: "Infants are to be baptized for the remission of sins. Cyprian�s reply to a country bishop, Fidus, who wrote him regarding the Baptism of infants, is even more explicit. Should we wait until the eighth day as did the Jews in circumcision? No, the child should be baptized as soon as it is born (To Fidus 1: 2).



To prevent misunderstanding by rural bishops, perhaps not as well-schooled as other or even new to the faith, the Sixteenth Council of Carthage in 418 unequivocally stated: "If any man says that newborn children need not be baptized . . . let him be anathema."



Augustine



Augustine (354 - 430), writing about this time in De Genesi Ad Literam, X: 39, declares, "The custom of our mother church in baptizing infants must not be . . . accounted needless, nor believed to be other than a tradition of the apostles."



He further states, "If you wish to be a Christian, do not believe, nor say, nor teach, that infants who die before baptism can obtain the remission of original sin." And again, "Whoever says that even infants are vivified in Christ when they depart this life without participation in His sacrament (Baptism), both opposes the Apostolic preaching and condemns the whole church which hastens to baptize infants, because it unhesitatingly believes that otherwise the), cannot possibly be vivified in Christ."



Specific directions, with detailed instructions, for the baptizing of infants were given by bishops to pastors and deacons during this era of Christian history. In the year 517, seven bishops met in Gerona, Catelina, and framed 10 rules of discipline for the church in Spain. The fifth rule states that ". . . in case infants ill . . . if they were offered, to baptize them, even though it were the day that then, were born . . . " such was to be done (The History of Baptism by Robert Robinson, [London: Thomas Knott, 1790], p.269.).



The foregoing pattern, practiced in both East and West, remained customary in Christianity through the Dark and Middle Ages until modem times. Generally, the infant was baptized during the first week of life, but in cases of illness this took place on the day of birth. An example of this already comes from about 260 in North Africa in an inscription from Hadrumetum (Inscriptiones Latinae Christianae Veteres II, 4429-A):



Arisus in pace natus bixit supra scriptas VIIII



This Latin inscription indicates that a child who died nine hours after its birth was baptized. Such practice of Baptism within the first days of life. or on the day of birth in an emergency, remained for both Protestants, Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodox.



The Witness of the Catacombs



The witness of the literary texts of the early church fathers, councils and apologists for the practice of infant Baptism in the first Christian centuries receives valuable confirmation from the catacombs and cemeteries of the Middle East, Africa and southern Europe, Below are epitaphs from the 200�s of small children who had been baptized. it is interesting to note that there are no Christian epitaphs in existence earlier than 200. As soon as the era of Christian Inscriptions begins, we find evidence for infant Baptism.



In that century there are attributes and symbols in tombstones inscriptions of little children which allows us to clearly infer we are dealing with baptized children. The following is as early as 200 or shortly thereafter:



In the second last line is the phrase Dei Serv(u)s which means slave of God followed by the Chi Rho symbol for Christ. The last line is the Greek ichtheos familiar as the "fish symbol" - an anagram for Jesus Christ God�s Son Savior. These words and symbols mark the one-year, two months, and four-day-old child as a baptized Christian.



From the Lateran Museum, also from the 200�s, is a Greek inscription that gives information about the religious status of the parents. It reads, "I, Zosimus, a believer from believers, lie here having lived 2 years, 1 month, 25 days."



Also from this era are headstones for children who received emergency baptism with ages ranging from 11 months to 12 years. Since the patristic sources of the third century, as those earlier, give us to understand that the children of Christian parents were baptized in infancy, we must conclude that these emergency baptisms were administered to children of non-Christians. The inscriptions themselves confirm this conclusion. In the Roman catacomb of Priscilla is reference to a private emergency baptism that was administered to the one-and-three-quarter-year-old Apronianus and enabled him to die as a believer. The inscription reads:



Dedicated to the departed Florentius made this inscription for his worthy son Apronianus who lived one year and nine months and five days. As he was truly loved by his grandmother and she knew that his death was imminent, she asked the church that he might depart from, the world as a believer.



The fact that it was the grandmother who urged the baptism makes it very probable that the father of the child, Florentius, was a pagan. This is confirmed by the formula in the first line which is pagan and not found on any other Christian epitaphs. We have thus in this inscription evidence for a missionary baptism administered to a dying non-Christian infant.



Sole Opponent - A Heretic



In the 1,500 years from the time of Christ to the Protestant Reformation, the only bonafide opponent to infant Baptism was Tertullian (160 - 215), bishop of Carthage, Africa. His superficial objection was to the unfair ability laid on godparents when the children of pagans joined the church, However, his real opposition was more fundamental. It was his view that sinfulness begins at the "puberty, of the soul,,, that is "about the fourteenth year of life" and "it drives man out of the paradise of innocence" (De Anima 38:2). This rules out the belief in original sin.



Tertullian�s stance, together with other unorthodox views, led him to embrace Montanism in 207. Montanism denied the total corruption and sinfulness of human nature. With its emphasis upon the supernatural gifts of the Holy Spirit, it was the precursor to the modern Charismatic Movement.



Except for Tertullian�s heretical views, marking his departure from mainstream Christianity, the only other opposition to infant Baptism came during a brief period in the middle of the fourth century. The issue was the fear of post-Baptismal sin. This heretical view also denied Baptism to adults until their death-bed. It was not in reality a denial of infant baptism in and of itself In fact, the heresy encouraged the Baptism of infants when death seemed imminent, as it also did for adults.



The Anabaptists



Not until the 1520s did the Christian Church experience opposition specifically to infant Baptism. Under the influence of Thomas Muenzer and other fanatics who opposed both civil and religious authority, original sin and human concupiscence was denied until the "age of accountability." Although there is no basis in Scripture for this position. a considerable number of Swiss, German and Dutch embraced the Anabaptist cause. So offensive was this position that Roman Catholics, Lutherans and Reformed alike voiced strong warning and renunciation. It was considered a shameless affront to what had been practiced in each generation since Christ�s command in the Great Commission (Matthew 28: 18-20) to baptize all nations irrespective of age.



Regeneration for All Ages



Who would be so blind as to limit this expression of God�s grace and mercy to adolescents and adults and to exclude infants and children�s. If John the Baptizer could be filled with the Holy Spirit from his mother�s womb (Luke 1: 15), and if Jesus could say (Matt. 18: 6), "Whoever offends one of these little ones (Gk."toddlers") who believe in Me, it were better that he were drowned in the depth of the sea," and if the Apostle Peter could say on the Day of Pentecost (Acts 2: 39), "The promise is unto you and to, your children, "what mere mortal dare declare so gracious an invitation to be invalid for infants, or forbid the continuance of the Baptism of infants for coming generations?



If the entire families and households of the Philippian Jailer, Lydia, Cornelius, Crispus and Stephanas of the New Testament were incorporated into the household of faith through Baptism, surely that testimony is immutable and established for all time.



Yes, we baptize babies. Unmistakably Scriptural proof substantiates that doctrine. Christian history, unbroken and uninterrupted. reflects such practice in each generation. Conscientious Christians do not delay but hasten with their children to Baptism that they may received the gift of salvation and regeneration and gratefully embrace the Apostle�s affirmation extended to those of all age groups: "For as many of you as have been baptized have put on Christ" (Galatians 3: 27).



Dennis Kastens is pastor of Peace Lutheran Church in St. Louis, Missouri.



Bible References



Acts 2: 38-39

38 Peter replied, "Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. 39 The promise is for you and your children and for all who are far off--for all whom the Lord our God will call."



1 Corinthians 1: 16

(Yes, I also baptized the household of Stephanas; beyond that, I don't remember if I baptized anyone else.)



Acts 11: 14

He will bring you a message through which you and all your household will be saved.'



Acts 16: 15, 33

15 When she and the members of her household were baptized, she invited us to her home. "If you consider me a believer in the Lord," she said, "come and stay at my house." And she persuaded us. 33 At that hour of the night the jailer took them and washed their wounds; then immediately he and all his family were baptized.



Acts 18: 8

Crispus, the synagogue ruler, and his entire household believed in the Lord; and many of the Corinthians who heard him believed and were baptized.



Matthew 28: 18-20

18 Then Jesus came to them and said, "All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. 19 Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20 and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age."



Luke 1: 15

for he will be great in the sight of the Lord. He is never to take wine or other fermented drink, and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit even from birth.



Matthew 18: 6

But if anyone causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a large millstone hung around his neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea.



Galatians 3: 27

for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ.

Post Reply



View Profile
History
Infant Baptism in Early Church History
Posted : 10 Jun, 2010 11:17 PM

InHisHonour, no... but I did look at you when I said senile :goofball:

After all, you ARE 10 years old older than me! But I would still bake you a cake =)

Post Reply



View Profile
History
Infant Baptism in Early Church History
Posted : 10 Jun, 2010 11:20 PM

Pixy, knowing James, he most likely was being fresh mouth :ROFL:



IHH, yes you quoted great scriptures, but can you truly say this applies to a baby or a child that God would hold accountable for sins they have not committed? I don't think so, because otherwsie as I've been saying Jesus would not have compared the child to the kingdom of God, because they are innocent until proven guilty which is the age of them taking responsibility of knowing right from wrong.



Yes, we ALL have sinned, past tense, and do sin, present tense, and will sin, future tense. But think about it, an innocent baby or child knows nothing about sin. We are born in sin because of Adam it is our sin nature UNTIL we are able to recognize we need a savior.



Therefore, when a baby or a child become of age to understand these things this will apply. What does a baby or child know about being born into sin from the mothers womb NOTHING! They are without understanding and therefore God does not hold them accountable. How can a person be rightly judge if they don't know? They can't, even scripture tells us this where there is no law of God there is no transgression.

Post Reply

InHisHonor

View Profile
History
Infant Baptism in Early Church History
Posted : 10 Jun, 2010 11:23 PM

See there you're wrongo! I'm only 9 years and 11 months older then you and I'll still take your CAKE please and thank you very much.

Oh what were we talking about?:toomuch:

Post Reply



View Profile
History
Infant Baptism in Early Church History
Posted : 10 Jun, 2010 11:25 PM

Do you need me to spoon feed you the cake, Darling? I wouldn't want you to strain your elderly self by lifting the fork :goofball:

Post Reply

InHisHonor

View Profile
History
Infant Baptism in Early Church History
Posted : 10 Jun, 2010 11:28 PM

ET I agree with you but just because they don't KNOW they sin does not mean they don't sin. They sin but do not understand. I believe that God does not hold them responsible because they are to young to understand. I believe that God washes away their sin because He is a merciful God.

Post Reply



View Profile
History
Infant Baptism in Early Church History
Posted : 10 Jun, 2010 11:28 PM

ooooooooooowwwweeee Pixy , you flirting with IHH.. I'm gone tell-it!:ROFL::peace::toomuch:



BTW IHH, Pixy can't cook, so watch and pray with the cake:yay::eat::peace::ROFL:

Post Reply

InHisHonor

View Profile
History
Infant Baptism in Early Church History
Posted : 10 Jun, 2010 11:31 PM

Lixy if could move fast enough with my walker I would teach you a lesson. :ROFL:

Post Reply



View Profile
History
Infant Baptism in Early Church History
Posted : 10 Jun, 2010 11:34 PM

:ROFL:...IHH that's good.... well you can always teach her how to push and walk:ROFL::dancingp:

Post Reply

InHisHonor

View Profile
History
Infant Baptism in Early Church History
Posted : 10 Jun, 2010 11:37 PM

no way ET she may try to push me over then I would break a hip.

Post Reply



View Profile
History
Infant Baptism in Early Church History
Posted : 10 Jun, 2010 11:39 PM

:ROFL::bouncy:

Post Reply

Page : 1 2 3 4 5 6