Author | Thread: Beautiful Women | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Admin |
Beautiful WomenPosted : 23 Jul, 2009 10:31 PMIt's very obvious after looking at some men's profiles that looks are very high at the top of the list for some if not most men. Attached on most profiles is something like this, "prefer a woman who stays fit", "I like a woman who takes care of herself", "a woman who is in shape". While some men may actually mean that, we women know that it's also code for not fat. |
|||
View Profile History |
Beautiful WomenPosted : 31 Jul, 2009 09:47 PMTwo things: |
|||
View Profile History |
Beautiful WomenPosted : 1 Aug, 2009 04:06 AMIf you are trying to justify eating whatever you want for the sake of self gratification that is the wrong assumption to make. With the understanding that the Old Testament scriptures you mentioned are under the law given unto Moses whatever they ate was appropriated as satisfactory by god. For example, avoiding eating scavengers like pigs, crustaceans, and eating such things such as fish, and beef. Also, meats such as beef contain less saturated fat than pork due to a cow�s diet of light grasses. This is assuming the cows are raised in the natural setting on a grazing field. Not the cows of today, produced by the beef industry which is fed steroids and other fattening foods for quickness and profit. Also, fish contains such things as omega 3 fatty acids as well as other good protein chains, it is a lean meat, and not filled with the fat of other animals, not containing the saturated fats of meat animals. It promotes heart health, has been shown to prevent cancer, and has many other health benefits like boosting metabolic rates. Thinking you can eat a trans fat filled candy bar, or a 40 oz. steak filled with saturated and just say grace and it is all ok is not the proper manner to handle your diet, or live a long and healthy life. |
|||
View Profile History |
Beautiful WomenPosted : 1 Aug, 2009 04:11 PMI'm not going to argue with you. That would be unedifying. The three Hebrew children did not eat those things because they did not appear on the God approved diet. Not because of the nutritional factor. They followed the Israel diet, that's why they did it not because those things are bad for you. They were looking at the spiritual not the natural. You wrote in your own response that exercise is of little, or puny, benefit. That's why it's more important to look after the spiritual. If you wouldn't pressure someone great. But when should being saved be a preference? |
|||
DontHitThatMark
View Profile History |
Beautiful WomenPosted : 1 Aug, 2009 04:52 PM:laugh:dude...I think you're going to need to borrow my shovel...I'll see you in china! I think I'm gonna get there first though:goofball:. |
|||
View Profile History |
Beautiful WomenPosted : 1 Aug, 2009 05:19 PMP.S. Mentioning when should being saved be a preference, I was referrin to my list of questions to ask. Saved should not be a preference. I said clearly in my post that women should look well and be healthy. Di you not read that? You used Scripture but used it in the wrong way. The three Hebrew children did not eat that because it was not in the diet God gave them to eat. They were really being obedient Scripturally and spiritually. Not because those foods were bad nutrition. That is why that Scripture says, bodily or physical exercise profits little. I used five verses from three chapters seeing what it says over the course of different chapters or verses or places. You used one. |
|||
|
||||
DontHitThatMark
View Profile History |
Beautiful WomenPosted : 1 Aug, 2009 05:19 PMYikes...I think I'll follow the God approved diet. What He says usually works out. And you're right...bodily exercise doesn't save you....but it sure makes this life easier, and it's a good witness for Christians to be healthy and happy. Why would someone want to be a christian if we're all sick and mean? And I have to agree with "Xxbruthaman17xX"...preferences are important to a happy marriage. You're supposed to find someone compatible. Not just someone that loves God. Finding someone that loves God is almost more of a requirement then a preference. So while I would PREFER someone like me...that's all it is...a preference. Not a requirement. Like I said, if I found someone I couldn't live without, my preferences wouldn't matter. But I don't think preferences are bad...only when they're actually requirements pretending to be preferences, lol...if that makes sense... |
|||
DontHitThatMark
View Profile History |
Beautiful WomenPosted : 1 Aug, 2009 05:22 PMNo fair! You snuck that in before mine! *pout* |
|||
DontHitThatMark
View Profile History |
Beautiful WomenPosted : 1 Aug, 2009 05:29 PMAnd a question, gloryshine...aren't you judging someone for judging other people?:goofball: Aren't you eliminating people as options, and telling other people to do the same because you don't like their "preferences/requirements"? Just curious...and...who has another shovel? I think I'm going to need one...I let someone else borrow mine... |
|||
View Profile History |
Beautiful WomenPosted : 1 Aug, 2009 05:39 PMTo acknowledge that some people's preferences are out line is good. To stay away from those people and advise others to do so, is good. I'm just observing that some people, particularly males, seem to be off balance in their "preferential" view of women. To help women by helping them avoid them, is not bad, nor is it any judging. To have the "requirements" in a bad way is bad. To advise others to bypass those who do that is wise. |
|||
View Profile History |
Beautiful WomenPosted : 1 Aug, 2009 06:15 PMBeating women is bad. If I say it's wrong for a man to beat a woman, am I judging him or acknowledging that he's doing something wrong? Would I be wise to stay away from someone who beats women and advises other women to do so, or would I be judgmental by bypassing him? These questions are obvious. It's okay to say that some men put unrealistic standards on women. And it's okay to stay away from them and advise others to do so. If someone has unfair standards for some women, that's what's wrong. Not saying something about the behavior. |
First | << Previous 10 | Page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Next 10 >> | Last |